The Costs of Terrorism

Staggering

The economy up in smoke A bit over three years ago, an army of 19 men armed with pocket cutters grounded in two hours every airplane of the world's mightiest country, levelled the heart of its financial centre, sent its president initially running for cover, and in one swift stroke changed the world's political and economic landscape for years to come.

More than three years, two costly wars, several bankrupt airlines and one jailed dictator later, how much does the bill of this one atrocity amount to? Add in Bali, Beslan, the ETA and the IRA, Madrid, Egypt, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Colombia and Kashmir, and how much does terrorism really cost?

According to Bruno S. Frey, Simon Luechinger and Alois Stutzer of the University of Zurich, much, much more than you think.

In their CESifo Working Paper "Calculating Tragedy: Assessing the Costs of Terrorism," the researchers provide some chilling pointers. Disappearing tourism, plummeting foreign and domestic investment, depressed domestic consumption, higher security-related expenses and you are quickly talking about serious money. The compensation paid out by the U.S. government and insurance companies to victims of September 11th alone, according to the Rand Corporation, amounts to at least US$ 38.1 billion.

And this is only half the story. The fear of further atrocities, the pain and mourning of the victims and their families, the feelings of insecurity, the lengthy lines at airport checkpoints —in other words, the deterioration in the quality of life must also be taken into account in any calculation of the social costs.

In order to measure such intangible negative effects, the authors suggest using independent surveys of individual subjective well-being such as those conducted by Eurobarometer, using the data to ascertain the worth respondents attach to the abatement of terrorism. Combining this data with data on terrorism, one can simultaneously estimate the effects of terrorism and income on well-being and, hence, the willingness-to-pay for a hypothetical reduction in terrorism. The authors demonstrate this in another study, where they find, for example, that North Ireland residents would be willing to forego up to 41% of their income if their territory were as peaceful as the rest of the U.K. This finding goes a long way to show just by how much the deterioration in quality of life exceeds the monetarily measurable costs.

B. S. Frey, S. Luechinger und A. Stutzer: Calculating Tragedy: Assessing the Costs of Terrorism, CESifo Working Paper No. 1341

B. S. Frey, S. Luechinger und A. Stutzer: Valuing Public Goods: The Life Satisfation Approach, CESifo Working Paper No. 1158

 

Note: This text is the responsibility of the writer and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of either the CESifo Working Paper author(s) cited or of the CESifo Group Munich.

Copyright © CESifo GmbH 2004. All rights reserved.